Comparison
XnConvert Alternative for Mac: Free and Broad, Images Only
XnConvert is a free batch image converter that reads more than 500 formats and stacks resize, watermark and rename steps into one pass. People look for an XnConvert alternative on Mac because it only handles images and its editing-pipeline interface is more than a simple compress job needs. We make Smol, which costs $29 once, and XnConvert costs nothing.
That asymmetry decides a lot of cases before they start, so this page says where XnConvert wins first and plainly. If your job is converting and editing a pile of images, the free tool is very hard to beat. If the pile also contains PDFs, screen recordings and audio, the picture changes.
Smol vs XnConvert: feature by feature
| Feature | Smol | XnConvert |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $29 once, 1 Mac | Free, no in-app purchases (Mac App Store listing) |
| Platforms | macOS only | macOS, Windows and Linux |
| macOS requirement | macOS 13+ on Apple Silicon, 14+ on Intel | macOS 10.12 or later |
| Image formats read | Common formats, HEIC, camera RAW (CR2, NEF, ARW, DNG) | 500+ formats |
| Image formats written | JPG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, HEIC, GIF, TIFF, BMP, PDF | 80+ formats |
| JPEG XL | — | Listed as an input format |
| Batch processing | Yes, drag in files or folders, mixed types | Yes, one pipeline applied to a folder |
| Watermark, filters and adjustments | — | ✓ |
| Batch rename with patterns | Output name and location settings only | ✓ |
| Metadata | Strips EXIF, GPS, IPTC and XMP by default; can be switched off | IPTC/XMP handling; strip or preserve EXIF |
| PDF compression | 5 presets, Tiny to Original | Not listed |
| Video and audio compression | ✓ | Not listed |
| Everything stays on your Mac | ✓ | ✓ |
| Trial | None, all sales final | Not needed, free |
| Latest release | Smol 1.0.35 | Version 1.118.0, 12 Oct 2026 (Mac App Store) |
Pros and cons
Smol
Pros
- Compresses PDFs, video and audio as well as images, in one window
- A quality setting from 0 to 100 instead of a pipeline of actions to assemble
- Finder Quick Action, menu bar tray, clipboard compression and watched folders
- Upscales images 2×, 3× or 4×, and can target a file size from 4 to 4096 KB
- Never overwrites originals by default; output is a copy beside the original
- Converts tables and web fonts too (CSV, JSON, XLSX, TTF, WOFF2)
Cons
- Costs $29 where XnConvert is free, with no free trial and no refunds
- macOS only; XnConvert also runs on Windows and Linux
- Reads far fewer image formats and has no JPEG XL support
- No watermarks, filters, color adjustments, borders or pattern-based batch rename
- No lossless mode for images; it always re-encodes
- Not the fastest tool: 24 small images took about 7 seconds in our test
XnConvert
Pros
- Completely free, with no ads, no account and no in-app purchases
- Opens 500+ formats and writes 80+, including RAW, HEIC and JPEG XL as inputs
- Resize, crop, rotate, watermark, filter and rename in a single pipeline applied to a whole folder
- Handles IPTC/XMP metadata and can strip or preserve EXIF, for photographers and archivists
- Handles multipage TIFF
- Same tool on macOS, Windows and Linux, and an actively updated Mac build
Cons
- Images only: its listing mentions no PDF, video or audio compression
- The action pipeline is more setup than a quick compress needs
- Its listing describes no compression-to-target-size mode or quality-first workflow; you assemble the settings yourself
- No Finder Quick Action, watched folder or clipboard feature is described in its listing
When XnConvert is the better choice
Four cases where XnConvert is the better pick and paying us $29 would be wasted money.
You only handle images. If the folder never holds a PDF or a video, XnConvert covers conversion, resizing and renaming for $0, and our extra formats do nothing for you.
You need unusual formats. XnConvert lists 500+ input formats including RAW, HEIC and JPEG XL. Smol does not write JPEG XL, SVG or ICNS and reads a much shorter list. For archives and odd files, XnConvert is the tool.
You edit while you convert. Watermarks, captions, borders, levels, color balance, sharpening and pattern renaming all live inside XnConvert’s pipeline. Smol does none of them. A photographer stamping proofs for a hundred files wants XnConvert.
You are not only on a Mac. The same app runs on Windows and Linux, so a mixed team can share one workflow. Smol cannot.
Is XnConvert worth it in 2026?
Yes, because it costs nothing and does a great deal for images. Its Mac App Store listing calls it the free batch image converter for macOS, lists no in-app purchases, and says no data is collected and nothing is uploaded. The same listing shows version 1.118.0, released 12 October 2026, so it is being updated now.
The honest cost is time rather than money. You build a pipeline (convert, resize, watermark, rename) and run it over a folder. That is a strength for editing jobs and a detour when all you want is a smaller file.
What does XnConvert not do?
It does not compress anything that is not an image, as far as its own listing says. The description covers photos, RAW, TIFF and similar formats, and mentions no PDF, video or audio handling. Everything on this page about XnConvert comes from that Mac App Store listing.
If the real problem is a 60 MB PDF or a screen recording, see how to compress a PDF on Mac and how to compress a video on Mac. Smol covers both in the same window as your photos, with presets for PDFs and a quality choice for video.
Smol’s own image defaults are worth knowing: quality 75, metadata stripped, and images resized to fit inside 2000 × 2000 px unless you change it. Photographers should raise or switch off that resize first.
Which one makes smaller image files?
We have not benchmarked XnConvert, so we will not claim a winner. What we can say is about our own measurements: in our published benchmark, Smol’s AVIF needed 22 to 26% fewer bytes than the best JPEG at the same SSIMULACRA2 score. That used 24 small (768 × 512) film photographs, tuned to matched quality scores, so it is not a prediction for your camera files.
Format choice matters more than which app you pick. For the wider field, see the best image compressor for Mac and every method compared.
Why do people look for an XnConvert alternative?
Mostly because the job grew past images. A designer who starts by converting HEIC photos ends up with a 90 MB PDF proposal, a screen recording to send to a client and a voice memo to shrink. XnConvert, by its own listing, is an image converter, so each of those needs another app. One tool for all four is the real pitch for Smol, and it is the only one we will make.
The second reason is shape. XnConvert is built around a pipeline of steps run over a folder. That is exactly right when you are resizing, watermarking and renaming proofs. It is more steps than needed when the whole request is “make these smaller.” Smol has one quality setting for that, plus a Finder Quick Action so you can right-click files without opening the app at all. Our guide to adding a Compress Quick Action to Finder shows the setup.
The third reason is not a complaint at all. Some people simply want a second opinion on output size, and a free tool plus a paid one is a cheap way to get it.
Can both handle HEIC and camera RAW?
Both can read them. XnConvert’s listing names HEIC and RAW input and says you can convert RAW to TIFF. Smol accepts CR2, NEF, ARW and DNG as input and compresses or converts them, but it does not develop RAW, so exposure and white balance are not adjustable there.
For iPhone photos the two are close in scope: both turn HEIC into JPG in bulk, and both work locally. If photographers are your audience, read image compression for photographers before choosing, because Smol’s default 2000 px resize and metadata stripping suit web delivery and not archives. XnConvert’s listing says it handles IPTC/XMP metadata and can preserve EXIF, which is the better fit when copyright fields must survive.
How do I move from XnConvert to Smol?
Drag the same folder into Smol and choose Compress with an output format. Quality applies to Compress, so for a small JPG from a HEIC, compress with JPG as the output rather than using Convert. There is nothing to import from XnConvert, and pipelines you built there do not carry over. Recreate the settings in a preset on each Mac.
The most common switch is iPhone photos: see batch convert HEIC to JPG on Mac. For a free alternative that stays images-only, compare Caesium. Smol is a one-time $29 purchase, with no trial and no refunds, so confirm the formats on our list first.
Frequently asked questions
Is XnConvert really free on Mac?
Its Mac App Store listing says it is completely free, with no subscription, no in-app purchases and no upsell. It also states there are no ads and no account. This describes the App Store version; check the vendor site for the terms of other downloads.
What is a good XnConvert alternative for Mac?
It depends on the gap. For PDFs, video and audio alongside images, Smol is $29 once. For a free images-only compressor, there is Caesium. For converting and editing many formats for free, XnConvert is already the strongest choice, so many people should simply stay.
Does XnConvert compress PDFs or video?
Its Mac App Store listing describes a batch image converter and mentions no PDF, video or audio compression. For those file types, a separate tool is needed. Smol compresses PDFs with five presets, video to MP4, MOV, WebM or MKV, and audio, all on your Mac with nothing uploaded.
Does Smol support as many formats as XnConvert?
No. XnConvert lists 500+ input formats, JPEG XL among them, and 80+ output formats. Smol reads common image formats, HEIC and camera RAW, and writes JPG, PNG, WebP, AVIF, HEIC, GIF, TIFF, BMP and PDF. It has no JPEG XL, SVG or ICNS output.
Does Smol upload my files like an online converter?
No. Smol runs on your Mac with no account and no server, so nothing is uploaded. XnConvert says the same about itself. The difference is price and scope: XnConvert is free and images only, while Smol is $29 once with no trial and covers PDFs, video and audio too.
Keep reading